{"id":300,"date":"2025-02-05T09:55:35","date_gmt":"2025-02-05T09:55:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/?page_id=300"},"modified":"2025-02-05T09:55:35","modified_gmt":"2025-02-05T09:55:35","slug":"project-2-matrix-evaluationlevel-3-ext","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/project-2-matrix-evaluationlevel-3-ext\/","title":{"rendered":"Project 2-  Matrix Evaluation(Level 3 ext)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong><\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Referral<\/strong>&nbsp;Work submitted fails to meet one or more of the assessment criteria and is of a poor standard.&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Satisfactory<\/strong>&nbsp;Work submitted meets all of the assessment&nbsp;criteria and is of a satisfactory standard.&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Good<\/strong>&nbsp;Work submitted meets all&nbsp;assessment&nbsp;criteria and is of a high standard.&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Excellent<\/strong>&nbsp;Work submitted meets all assessment criteria and is of a very high standard.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Context&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Limited understanding of subject context, lacking clarity in aims and purpose.&nbsp;<\/td><td><mark class=\"has-inline-color has-yellow-color\">Understanding of subject context used appropriately to make judgments, describe aims and clarify purpose.\u00a0<\/mark><\/td><td>Good understanding and knowledge of subject context used to make sound judgments, articulate ambitions and clarify purpose.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Comprehensive understanding and knowledge of subject context used to communicate complex concepts,&nbsp;articulate ambitions and clarify purpose.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Research&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Little or no evidence presented or information does not relate sufficiently to task.&nbsp;<\/td><td><mark class=\"has-inline-color has-yellow-color\">Sufficient relevant information has been gathered, documented and used in the development of ideas.\u00a0<\/mark><\/td><td>Thorough and sustained research and investigation of relevant sources, interpretation and synthesis of information used to inform, support and develop ideas.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Independently identified, thorough and sustained research and investigation of a range of relevant sources, insightful interpretation and synthesis of information used&nbsp;to inform, support and develop ideas.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Problem Solving&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>&nbsp;Insufficient exploration of alternative ideas and processes.&nbsp;&nbsp;Problems unresolved.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td><mark class=\"has-inline-color has-yellow-color\">\u00a0Sufficient exploration of alternative ideas using established approaches to resolve practical and theoretical problems\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/mark><\/td><td>&nbsp;Decisive demonstration&nbsp;&nbsp;of initiative in effectively solving problems, adapting to unforeseen practical and theoretical challenges to achieve identified goals.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td>&nbsp;Decisive demonstration of&nbsp;&nbsp;initiative in effectively solving problems, autonomously implementing creative solutions and adapting to unforeseen practical and theoretical challenges to achieve identified goals.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Planning and&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>Production&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Ineffective planning and&nbsp;&nbsp;little or no evaluation against aims. Task or tasks are incomplete.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td><mark class=\"has-inline-color has-yellow-color\">Evidence of effective planning and evaluation against aims that have contributed to a satisfactory completion of the task or tasks.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/mark>\u00a0\u00a0<\/td><td>Coherent and reasoned planning, subject engagement and commitment.&nbsp; Realistic evaluation against aims and efficient production against timescales.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td>Detailed and coherent self-directed planning and negotiation, subject engagement and commitment.&nbsp; Continuous evaluation&nbsp;&nbsp;against aims and efficient production against timescales.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Practical&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>Skills&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td><mark class=\"has-inline-color has-yellow-color\">Limited range of processes demonstrated, judgement and execution of techniques is poor.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/mark>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/td><td>Adequate range of processes, skills and knowledge demonstrated. Competent execution and application of techniques used to develop ideas.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td>Consistent and appropriate processes, skills and knowledge applied to extend enquiry and develop creative solutions.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td>In depth understanding and&nbsp;&nbsp;aesthetic awareness, imaginative and flexible processes, skills and knowledge applied in extensive enquiry to develop creative solutions.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Evaluation and&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>Reflection&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Insufficient evidence of ongoing evaluation, lack of or only basic analysis and little or no justification for ideas.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td>Clearly communicated&nbsp;&nbsp;evidence of valid evaluation and&nbsp;&nbsp;realistic analysis independently used to inform and develop ideas.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td><mark class=\"has-inline-color has-yellow-color\">Effective communication of analysis and interpretation, independent synthesis of information and application of reasoned decision making to inform development of ideas.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/mark>\u00a0<\/td><td>&nbsp;Accomplished and professional communication of perceptive analysis and interpretation, demonstrating clarity and sophistication in thinking and maturity in decision making to progress ideas.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Presentation&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td><mark class=\"has-inline-color has-yellow-color\">Ineffective communication and presentation of ideas.\u00a0 Lack of clarity in structure, selection and organisation.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/mark><\/td><td>Competent&nbsp;&nbsp;communication and&nbsp;&nbsp;sufficient clarity and consistency in presentation of ideas appropriate to the intended&nbsp;&nbsp;audience&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td>Confident selection, organisation and communication of ideas. Consistent approach to presentation demonstrating a good understanding of conventions and standards.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><td>Confident selection, organisation and communication of ideas.&nbsp; Demonstrating autonomy, personal style and an ambitious use of available resources to communicate ideas effectively to an intended audience.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 &nbsp; Referral&nbsp;Work submitted fails to meet one or more of the assessment criteria and is of a poor standard.&nbsp; Satisfactory&nbsp;Work submitted meets all of the assessment&nbsp;criteria and is of a satisfactory standard.&nbsp; Good&nbsp;Work submitted meets all&nbsp;assessment&nbsp;criteria and is of a high standard.&nbsp; Excellent&nbsp;Work submitted meets all assessment criteria and is of a very high &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/project-2-matrix-evaluationlevel-3-ext\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Project 2-  Matrix Evaluation(Level 3 ext)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":810,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-300","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/300","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/810"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/300\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":318,"href":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/300\/revisions\/318"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/digitalspace.bradfordcollege.ac.uk\/10684265\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}